วันศุกร์ที่ 25 ตุลาคม พ.ศ. 2556

Ameritopia by Mark Levin

There are books that enjoyed, slowly digested your mind like a fine multi-course dinner, and reminded to fill lovingly. Mark Levin was one of these books to freedom and tyranny. And then there are books that your mind like a fantasy set to exceptionally to extend that it juicy taste is sweet, surreal, seem never to forget. Mark Levin Ameritopia is one of these books.

Levin begins by dissecting the ideas of these great thinkers to influence, as she designed America's Government most responsible for our founder. Levin not simply mention names like Locke, Montesquieu, Tocqueville, and then throw a few inspiring quotes to the reader. Levin correlates with their ideas, where they fit in the founding of the United States of America.

Levin in detail these philosophers influence on Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin, how they designed the Declaration of independence. He explains their impact in particular on Madison in the design of the Constitution in General, and the Bill of rights. Levin deals Alexis de Tocqueville of democracy in America, as the French scholar sometimes Americans their uniqueness in the world, and his hope that they keep their characteristic values and their commitment to freedom and limited Government.

And come this season of serious choice and with our freedom is perched precariously in the balance, Ameritopia could not have been better. I will shout this book of praise to all who will listen, and probably not some. This book is a classic. It is a pity, as Levin later in the book, at that time constraints prevented him to list the other crimes against the freedom during the last century of the progressive, Extras and Collectivists committed.

This miserable disaffected present themselves as Savior, that "made would save us from the"mistakes"our founder". You put their distorted perception of humanity with the chains of the big Government of the liberation of the individual unlimited for the benefit of humanity in slings. You want - such as the large it have collectivist?-Amerika fundamentally change. She would like to jeopardise what- how did these great American expressed? the last hope of people on Earth.

Levin makes everything! and Ameritopia for all readers of the scholars, students, to the uninitiated that is easy to digest. It is not only important that every American to read it; It is important that every American to read it. Ameritopia is not only a textbook for understanding, the concept and the design of the American Liberty. It is a battle plan for their retention.

Steve writes about issues in connection with the police, writing, freedom and Seattle at: http://www.stevepomper.com/. If you have questions, delete comments, concerns about these issues, please Steve a line.



วันพุธที่ 16 ตุลาคม พ.ศ. 2556

"You Snooze, You Lose" - New Global Values and Morals

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Prime Minister Brown of Britain, said it best, and I shall paraphrase: we have no Global Morals, nor Values, speaking economically.

Let me be frank, and speak for the whole world in general, we do have values, values being those things in life we value the most, but they've changed, and as far as morals go, those things that are under the heading of ethics-I used to have to take an ethics class once a year to keep up my counselling license-teaching me to maintain my principles, a code of behaviour, honour (respect, regard) not like today, it is a code of horror. We don't have the same old style, or type we had forty years ago. Mr. Brown should remember we took them out of the schools, with God, and Liberty, and saluting the flag, at least in America we did, and usually the world follows America, right to the abyss sometimes. Anyhow, we got want we planted, 'You snooze, you lose,' that is our new morals and values in a nutshell. If you don't like it, it's too bad, it is what we planted, and it is what is being harvested, and it is why were in such a worldwide crisis today. I feel sorry for the young generation; they have to live with the garbage we planted.

I had to teach full grown men, while in my counselling career, those coming out of prison, into a halfway house back into society, that without discipline, there are no limits to a person's behaviour; nothing to govern them by if you do not have a moral code (meaning good behaviour). They thought I was talking Greek. We got what we deserve; now we are complaining. Doesn't that beat all? What did Mr. Brown expect; flowers from planting in manure for forty-years. Trying to teach an old wolf morals and principles, and discipline, and values, is like trying to part the Red Sea, good luck.



วันจันทร์ที่ 7 ตุลาคม พ.ศ. 2556

A Review of Barack Obama's the Audacity of Hope

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

In his book, The Audacity of Hope, President Barak Obama addresses issues that catapulted him to fame and brought the hope that he would be a prominent presidential election candidate. The book is originally his speech in Illinois state elections for senate chamber which has been delivered in 2004 in only 20 minutes. Later in 2006 he published that speech under the title "Audacity of Hope" that has the same themes he touched upon in the campaign speech in 2004.

Chapter one

The first chapter of the book is dedicated to two American parties, Democrats and Republicans. In this chapter, Obama contents that the congress is now more partisan than other times and that these two parties should overlook the differences and show collegiality and fellow feeling. He is not a supporter of mere partisan stance by the democrats against Republicans, nor does he agree with the old and worn out partisan poses or the Republicans. He hopes that Democrats show a sense of cooperation, while adhering to the central trends of the party.

Chapter two

He then in chapter two has recourse to politician behavior in the American political and social scene, asserting that in the age of information, not any of the politicians can remain exempt from the public scrutiny in the case of blunder. He calls for more adherences to political values in the face of conflict for sheer power. He also objects that the Democrat loss of offices comes from the internal factions and also from a more divisiveness with the Republicans. He admits that political scene dose not permit politician to remain true to their values. He finally hopes that the leaders of the two parties converge in the direction that its outcome be the nation's profit.

Chapter three

Then in chapter 3 Obama gives an account of legislation debate in which the law makers are actually reluctant to amendments necessary to make the law up-to-date according to the needs and requirements of the day. Personally, Obama is in the front who support the idea that, though the constitution is the historical phenomenon, we can have special cased that according to which this constitutions shows flexibility of interpretation. He generally supports this flexibility, when facing the needs of an ever-growing world.

Chapter four

Obama in chapter 4 goes back to previous discussion of politics and politicians, saying that special interest groups have an influence on them, who seek out their special interest during any political event. Obama declares that in order to tackle the problem of being at service of special interest groups and increase the efficacy of any political system, politicians should be true to the morality and values of the party. He, then, calls for democrats' appeasing the power-seeking parties and attitudes, so that they are able to serve their constituency better.

Chapter five

Obama, in chapter 5, this time targets economy and US economy in particular and considers its impact in social, cultural and political domains. According to him economic inefficiency is to the loss of the poor and marginalized people, but his own meetings with the prominent and wealthy people attests that his view is ironically also true.

Chapter six

He then, touches upon school reform, which has been implemented through empirical research. Religion and religious faith is Obama's next resort in his book, by which he contends republican show- off of the religious faith. He gives an account of his journey from atheism to faith and that religious faith has strengthened his personal and moral convictions. Obama objects that since Americans are deeply religious, the only by which democrats can win this people's consent is remaining in a sense of ease to religious faith. He concludes that religious tolerance is the best way to, for the two parties to have common grounds for ideas, not a hotspot in which they lead full-fledged war.

Chapter seven

Race is dominant theme in chapter 7. In this Obama admits that, although the institutionalized form of racial discrimination has been ended, but with a look at American social scene, one can notice subtle form of discrimination is still present, however this prejudice dose not stem from fundamentally race-based attitudes, but from sheer ignorance of its perpetrators. Obama wants all Americans to disagree with any cases of discrimination in order to uproot this filthy phenomenon from Black experience of life.

Chapter eight

Chapter 8 of the book is a scene in which Obama arranges American role in international politics and relations. He asserts that US defense budget is not in accord with the new patterns and needs of international relations and that American must attempt to assume more responsibility in facing the new paradigms emerging after 9 September 2001. In Iraq war issue, he believes that unilateralism was misguided and it has been poorly handled by Republican administration. He admits more multilateral efforts in solving world problems and that the Americans needlessly have been complacent about their role and function regarding the world affairs.

Chapter nine

The last chapter is family in which Obama gives his own childhood accounts. Obama here contends that Republican's stance over the family in posing personal dogmas in the frame of the law is not true to the private aspects of personal life. He finally asserts that in order to provide a center for children to thrive in, the families should have an unshakeable foundation and for that, supportive policies and personal responsibility must be dominant among the collective attitudes toward family.